Collaborative
scenarios such as group-work can be highly beneficial for children’s learning,
so long as they are carefully planned (Black & Wiliam, 2001). Collaboration can
help adults learn, too, and this is true of workplace contexts.
In terms of learning, human beings can be thought of as a form of ‘human capital’, and individual knowledge and skills provide an important resource – examples might include plumbers and bakers as well as brain surgeons or University Professors! But the value of this ‘per capita’ capital arguably increases if aggregated into ‘social capital’ (or ‘collaborative capital’): put simply, our knowledge and skills increases when we talk to each other! This is basically social constructivism in action, and its positive impact has been evidenced in several situations, for example teachers in New York (Leana, 2011). Extending the example of education, a
recent McKinsey and
Co. report stated that:
This implies that an
organisation does not automatically adopt good ideas, beliefs, and practice:
they have to be spread by means of colleagues communicating and sharing.
This
view of the importance of colleagues working together is shared by Professor
Michael Fullan who believes that collaboration is a key higher-order skill for
the 21st century (Fullan 2011?).
Many organisations
appreciate the value of collaboration for improving learning and overall effectiveness,
and encourage peer communications and support (Greer et al, 1998). Some may
even encourage ‘communities of practice’ (Wenger, 1999) - groups of people who
learn and develop together as an extension of their normal social interactions
within or beyond their work. For such communities to be effective, there needs to be a great deal of trust and cooperation between
members, and a clear focus of development and growth. Ideally, work-place
organisations will share the characteristics and goals of the communities of
practice within it, but that is not always the case as indicated in the table below based on
West-Burnham, 2014:
Organisation
|
Community
|
Competition
|
Collaboration
|
Hierarchy
|
Network
|
Top down power
|
Shared authority
|
Low trust/control
|
High trust/consent
|
Focus on Career
|
Focus on personal growth
|
Efficiency/outcomes
|
Enhanced value
|
Rule bound
|
Value driven
|
·
Black & Wiliam (2001) Inside the Black Box. [online] Available
at : http://weaeducation.typepad.co.uk/files/blackbox-1.pdf. [Accessed 12.10.14]
·
Brown, JS and
Duguid, P (2013) Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a
Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. Organisation Science. 2 (1).
·
Fullan, M. (2011) Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system
reform. Centre for Strategic Education Seminar Series Paper No. 204.
[online] Available at : http://edsource.org/wp-content/uploads/Fullan-Wrong-Drivers1.pdf
·
Greer, J.E., Mccalla, G., Collins,
J.A., Kumar, V.S., and Meagher, P. (1998) Supporting Peer Help and
Collaboration in Distributed Workplace Environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 9,
pp.159-177.
·
Leana, C.R. (2011) The missing link in school reform.Stanford
Social Innovation Review. [online] Available at:
http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/the_missing_link_in_school_reform/ (accessed 2.11.14)
·
McKinsey and
Company (2007). How the world’s best-performing schools come out on top. [online]
Available at: http://mckinseyonsociety.com/how-the-worlds-best-performing-schools-come-out-on-top/
·
Wenger, E. (1999) Communities
of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press
·
West-Burnham (2014) Making
collaboration work: from the structural to the relational. [online] Available
at : http://cdn.cfbt.com/~/media/cfbtcorporate/files/resources/inspiring-leadership-2014/seminar-southern-educational-leadership-trust-making-collaboration-work.pdf. [Accessed: 6.1.15]
No comments:
Post a Comment